{"id":509,"date":"2016-08-26T10:40:49","date_gmt":"2016-08-26T16:40:49","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/textor.ca\/?p=509"},"modified":"2016-08-26T10:43:44","modified_gmt":"2016-08-26T16:43:44","slug":"are-pensions-merely-ponzi-schemes","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.textor.ca\/are-pensions-merely-ponzi-schemes\/","title":{"rendered":"Are Pensions Merely Ponzi Schemes?"},"content":{"rendered":"
As one of th http:\/\/www.fiduciarynews.com\/2014\/08\/are-pensions-merely-ponzi-schemes\/<\/a><\/p>\n What do you think? Do you think it’s fair for a small group of people’s lifestyle to be funded by the Canadian Taxpayer?<\/p>\n I personally do not believe this is fair, and in 1999 when I was offered the choice between DB or DC pension (the last year DB was offered at the company I worked at), I chose a DC pension. In all honesty, I would rather no pension* as I have since learned of a way to not depend on\u00a0any<\/em> pension system which I talk about here:<\/p>\n<\/a>e Canada Post unions moves to disrupt the Canadian Postal system, I think now is a great time to discuss Defined Benefit (DB) Pensions which is the main issue for the union. Most private companies have moved to a Defined Contribution (DC) system; why? DB pensions are eerily similar to Ponzi schemes moving some to call DB pensions “legalized Ponzi schemes” (where the taxpayer bails out the “last in” pensioner and the company offering the DB pension goes into bankruptcy). FiduciaryNews.com published an enlightening article on Aug 28, 2014 that dives deeper into this question:<\/p>\n